I'm taking a break from my Best of 2009 series to do an old-school regular review. Not that there's much difference these days, but regardless. After much toil, I have finished reading Book 12 of The Wheel of Time, The Gathering Storm.
I've been a fan of this series since I discovered Robert Jordan in high school. I've stuck with it through it's best moments of coherence and the thousands upon thousands of words dedicated to fantasy world fashions. When Jordan died, I didn't think the series would ever be completed. Thank you, Brandon Sanderson, for giving us all hope that something will come out of all this chaos!
The problem with labyrinthine fantasy works like The Wheel of Time is that each book takes so long to read, and the wait between new volumes is usually so long (especially with Jordan dead) that it's nearly impossible to remember every fact, character interaction, subplot and even the facets of the main plot between readings.
This is one of the biggest complaints fans and critics have against this series. In fact, there used to be jokes that Jordan would just keep coming up with new plots, new machinations and the story would never end. A Zeno's Paradox of literature. Brandon Sanderson seems determined to end each and every hanging plotline Jordan ever created.
The Gathering Storm has the swiftest-running plot of any other book in the series, excepting perhaps the first book The Eye of the World. And yet, it's amazing how much exposition Sanderson crams into this book. It felt like 90% of each chapter was individual characters gazing off into the distance, contemplating their situations. A lot of stuff happens, but it's really hard to tell how much time passes between events. This could be a limitation on my part, not reading slowly or carefully enough, but between chapters especially, there seemed to be big segments of time that are ignored. The previous books got bogged down with presenting every mile of every journey the characters made, which is why the change is so jarring.
In the end, it was a really enjoyable read. It was nice to get back to Randland once again, and it was even nicer to feel like events were moving again. Even though it felt a little bit roller coaster-like. The book gets bonus points for starting to resolve plots and having a sense of "the beginning of the end." The series, however, loses a few points for general incomprehensibility that required a trip to encyclopedia fan sites to try and work out what was going on. Overall grade: A-
Khatru update: Script writing is going well, and I'm going to shoot for having a comic done for Friday. Last week was kind of chaotic, though, and I didn't get everything done that I wanted to.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Best Thriller of 2009
Presenting the Best Sci-Fi Thriller I Saw in 2009:
The Surrogates, starring Bruce Willis and Radha Mitchell
I was surprised to learn that this movie was originally based on a comic book by the same name. I suppose, looking at the premise and story, the filmmakers (Director Jonathan Mostow and Producer David Hoberman) would have needed to cash in on the ‘comic book movie’ game. It adds that little extra bit of novelty needed to make the film stand out against its competition (Valkyrie, Taken, etc).
That’s not to say I didn’t like it, though. The Surrogates is a sci-fi thriller starring Bruce Willis as FBI agent Tom Greer. The film borrows little bits from other movies – The Matrix’ mind plug-ins, Gattaca’s and A Scanner Darkly’s identity themes and even a little bit from Watchmen’s villain’s overall plan.
Plot
Twenty years ago (look up), brilliant scientist Dr. Lionel Canter, played by James Cromwell invents the Surrogate, an android body that one can pilot through a mind link. This turns society inside-out, because people no longer have to leave their houses. Instead of physically interacting with the world, people pilot their Surrogates to work, to parties, to shopping centers, and soldiers drive stripped down versions in combat. A small percentage of humanity shuns the use of Surrogates and is restricted to small ghetto- or reservation-like sections of major cities. They remind me of the Prawn city in District 9 – cluttered spaces where inhabitants have to reuse the cast-off materials from the rest of society to build lives for themselves.
The movie starts off with the first ever murder of a Surrogate where the destruction of the android body kills the user (the son of the original Surrogate inventor). Bruce Willis is the federal agent in charge of the case. He and his partner expose a conspiracy that wants to shatter the majority’s way of life.
Analysis
The Surrogates in the film appear to be a metaphor for the virtual worlds of the contemporary internet. The murdered son’s companion at the beginning is revealed to be an obese, hairy, quite disgusting man piloting an attractive female Surrogate. The creation of alternate personas is incredibly popular on the internet today. This anonymity is why our society has so many problems with identity theft and internet predators.
Strangely, the introduction of the film – a montage of news stories, similar to District 9 and others, states that crime has nearly been eliminated in the time since the introduction of Surrogates. There don’t seem to be any other scientific advances present in the film besides the androids; it’s possible that we’re not shown them, but I don’t think there were any. I also find it hard to believe that everyone on earth (barring the anti-Surrogate faction) owns and uses a Surrogate.
Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that it would take a lot more to get people to abandon physical interaction (particularly with family and friends, as shown in the film with Willis’ wife) and the satisfaction of tangibly interacting with the world. Particularly interesting is that the people don’t use their Surrogates to do anything interesting or adventurous – they go to work, they have meaningless casual sex with other androids; the most adventurous thing we see the Surrogate drivers doing is passing around a live wire, recreationally electrocuting themselves.
Like I said, I haven’t read the source comic book for this movie, but I wonder if it might have been more subversive than the movie let on. The movie’s message is obviously that we need to wrest our consciousnesses out of our virtual worlds and get back to the way we used to interact. I’d be interested to see what was cut or toned down from the comic to make it mainstream enough for the Common Denominator to enjoy.
Personally, I don’t see how the characters get anything meaningful out of their lives (You might say: ‘But James, Willis’ wife isn’t at all happy with her simulated life’ and I’d respond with: ‘She may not be happy, but it’s not because she’s dissatisfied with her Surrogate life, it’s because her unresolved grief from the death of her child. In fact, the only way she can keep along with her daily life without being shattered by grief is by assuming the calm, robotic Surrogate façade.), but then I’m not the kind of person who gets easily pulled into virtual worlds like Second Life or WoW (with apologies for the unintentional and implied insult to my friends who do play WoW).
P.S. I should mention that, if not for all the Shakey-Cam malarky that Star Trek put us through, that movie would have been my favorite Sci-Fi film of 2009. Besides, I already wrote about that one: Space, the Final Frontier...
The Surrogates, starring Bruce Willis and Radha Mitchell
I was surprised to learn that this movie was originally based on a comic book by the same name. I suppose, looking at the premise and story, the filmmakers (Director Jonathan Mostow and Producer David Hoberman) would have needed to cash in on the ‘comic book movie’ game. It adds that little extra bit of novelty needed to make the film stand out against its competition (Valkyrie, Taken, etc).
That’s not to say I didn’t like it, though. The Surrogates is a sci-fi thriller starring Bruce Willis as FBI agent Tom Greer. The film borrows little bits from other movies – The Matrix’ mind plug-ins, Gattaca’s and A Scanner Darkly’s identity themes and even a little bit from Watchmen’s villain’s overall plan.
Plot
Twenty years ago (look up), brilliant scientist Dr. Lionel Canter, played by James Cromwell invents the Surrogate, an android body that one can pilot through a mind link. This turns society inside-out, because people no longer have to leave their houses. Instead of physically interacting with the world, people pilot their Surrogates to work, to parties, to shopping centers, and soldiers drive stripped down versions in combat. A small percentage of humanity shuns the use of Surrogates and is restricted to small ghetto- or reservation-like sections of major cities. They remind me of the Prawn city in District 9 – cluttered spaces where inhabitants have to reuse the cast-off materials from the rest of society to build lives for themselves.
The movie starts off with the first ever murder of a Surrogate where the destruction of the android body kills the user (the son of the original Surrogate inventor). Bruce Willis is the federal agent in charge of the case. He and his partner expose a conspiracy that wants to shatter the majority’s way of life.
Analysis
The Surrogates in the film appear to be a metaphor for the virtual worlds of the contemporary internet. The murdered son’s companion at the beginning is revealed to be an obese, hairy, quite disgusting man piloting an attractive female Surrogate. The creation of alternate personas is incredibly popular on the internet today. This anonymity is why our society has so many problems with identity theft and internet predators.
Strangely, the introduction of the film – a montage of news stories, similar to District 9 and others, states that crime has nearly been eliminated in the time since the introduction of Surrogates. There don’t seem to be any other scientific advances present in the film besides the androids; it’s possible that we’re not shown them, but I don’t think there were any. I also find it hard to believe that everyone on earth (barring the anti-Surrogate faction) owns and uses a Surrogate.
Maybe it’s just me, but I feel that it would take a lot more to get people to abandon physical interaction (particularly with family and friends, as shown in the film with Willis’ wife) and the satisfaction of tangibly interacting with the world. Particularly interesting is that the people don’t use their Surrogates to do anything interesting or adventurous – they go to work, they have meaningless casual sex with other androids; the most adventurous thing we see the Surrogate drivers doing is passing around a live wire, recreationally electrocuting themselves.
Like I said, I haven’t read the source comic book for this movie, but I wonder if it might have been more subversive than the movie let on. The movie’s message is obviously that we need to wrest our consciousnesses out of our virtual worlds and get back to the way we used to interact. I’d be interested to see what was cut or toned down from the comic to make it mainstream enough for the Common Denominator to enjoy.
Personally, I don’t see how the characters get anything meaningful out of their lives (You might say: ‘But James, Willis’ wife isn’t at all happy with her simulated life’ and I’d respond with: ‘She may not be happy, but it’s not because she’s dissatisfied with her Surrogate life, it’s because her unresolved grief from the death of her child. In fact, the only way she can keep along with her daily life without being shattered by grief is by assuming the calm, robotic Surrogate façade.), but then I’m not the kind of person who gets easily pulled into virtual worlds like Second Life or WoW (with apologies for the unintentional and implied insult to my friends who do play WoW).
P.S. I should mention that, if not for all the Shakey-Cam malarky that Star Trek put us through, that movie would have been my favorite Sci-Fi film of 2009. Besides, I already wrote about that one: Space, the Final Frontier...
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Khatru 55!
Khatru 55 is up on Shastrix.com
Let me just say that drawing a cell phone in somebody's hand is really difficult. Sheesh. I guess it looks ok.
I really do intend to post more of my 2009 series. Maybe tomorrow (Saturday) or Sunday. The first two are really long - resembling more a term paper than a blog review. Someday, I'll put them in HTML form and post them on the website.
Let me just say that drawing a cell phone in somebody's hand is really difficult. Sheesh. I guess it looks ok.
I really do intend to post more of my 2009 series. Maybe tomorrow (Saturday) or Sunday. The first two are really long - resembling more a term paper than a blog review. Someday, I'll put them in HTML form and post them on the website.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Khatru 54!
Khatru 54 is up!
During the period I was drawing this comic, I was simultaneously watching a lot of the old (figuratively speaking) cartoon "Samurai Jack". This influence is most heavily seen in panel 5 here. In the script, I have:
5th panel: ECU (Extreme Close Up) on Ranger's eyes. They're furious. Perhaps even murderous.
I realized I do a lot of this type of thing; extreme close ups on people's eyes make it easier to show real emotion than the typical shots I draw. I also think of things in terms of camera shots. Thanks TV Journalism class! I guess.
I decided to add in the big black bands framing Ranger's eyes because of this tendency of mine. I'm sure it can get stale, so I changed it up.
The angled eyebrows are also a trademark of Samurai Jack, and they just sort of crept into my art. I also stole/was inspired by/stole the design of Samurai Jack hands (particularly in how they clench into fists. This might be the single greatest innovation I've ever come up with - I've struggled with hands since the beginning. The Samurai hands in 54 and the rage-clench hands from 53 are the beginnings of a whole new world!
During the period I was drawing this comic, I was simultaneously watching a lot of the old (figuratively speaking) cartoon "Samurai Jack". This influence is most heavily seen in panel 5 here. In the script, I have:
5th panel: ECU (Extreme Close Up) on Ranger's eyes. They're furious. Perhaps even murderous.
I realized I do a lot of this type of thing; extreme close ups on people's eyes make it easier to show real emotion than the typical shots I draw. I also think of things in terms of camera shots. Thanks TV Journalism class! I guess.
I decided to add in the big black bands framing Ranger's eyes because of this tendency of mine. I'm sure it can get stale, so I changed it up.
The angled eyebrows are also a trademark of Samurai Jack, and they just sort of crept into my art. I also stole/was inspired by/stole the design of Samurai Jack hands (particularly in how they clench into fists. This might be the single greatest innovation I've ever come up with - I've struggled with hands since the beginning. The Samurai hands in 54 and the rage-clench hands from 53 are the beginnings of a whole new world!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




